Filed under: Investment, telcos | Back to: Homepage
Last January I commented on Commander’s problems and made the point I thought they were doomed. Today they appointed official receivers.
I’ve made a comment on my Cranky Tech blog about the tragedy that companies with brilliant assets like Commander managed to squander them, but there’s many other lessons for Australian businesses which I’m mulling over at the moment and will post here later.
Filed under: Investment | Back to: Homepage
The saga of Commander’s slow demise raises some questions about the ability of Australia’s technology companies to meet the needs of the small to medium sized business market.
Commander, or Plestel as they were previously known as, were the monopoly provider of small business telephone systems prior to deregulation. At the time of being spun off from Telstra they had a marvellous position in the market.
For most small businesses, the term “Commander System” was synonymous with small business telephones and PABX systems and they had a ready made customer base of over 100,000 small businesses.
You’d think with hundreds of thousands of customers, an incumbent position and such a level of name recognition, it would be impossible to mess up a business like this.
Somehow, through a combination of overcharging and poor service, Commander’s management blew it. In the last nine years their customers have fled to other providers.
This year the share price has fallen from over $2.00 to around 40 cents. The 42c closing share price last Friday was half their issue price when they were floated in December 2000.
The final humiliation was their 18 day suspension from the stock exchange due to the auditors not being prepared to sign off the annual report.
So it’s funny we now see Australian IT reporting AAPT and Optus are looking at buying the company. The rationale being that Optus and AAPT have failed to get into the SMB market.
Commander failed because management didn’t understand the small business market and the economics of selling to the sector. Optus and AAPT have continually struggled with exactly the same issues.
So it’s hard to see how Optus or AAPT buying Commander could add anything to either company’s expertise (0r lack of it) in this field.
The other prospective buyers of Commander are various private equity groups. AVCAL, the Australian Private Equity & Venture Capital Association Limited, cite Commander as one of their success stories.
One hopes the next owner of Commander’s going to give AVCAL a real success story to crow about.
Filed under: Innovation, Investment | Back to: Homepage
Paul Graham’s VC blog has a provocative story on why startups should move to Silicon Valley to improve their chances of success. This raises the question should Australian startups follow his advice.
My view is a firm “yes”. Not only are Australian investors inexperienced in finding and nuturing startups but they are notoriously reluctant about putting money into anything remotely innovative or “outside the box”.
So it’s probably even more important Australian innovators to go the US than it is for their British, Irish or Indian counterparts.
What’s always amazed me with Australian investors is how they will keep backing known dogs. The best example was One.Tel where the founders repeated the mistakes they’d made in previous ventures but we’re able to keep the investor’s cash coming in because they were the right people who’d gone to the right schools.
For an unknown kid without connections and with a truly original idea (and One.Tel was certainly not an original idea) it’s difficult to see how they’d have any reason not to be on the first plane to San Francisco.
Interestingly, Paul Graham’s follow up blog post on the future of startups says “you don’t beat the incumbents; you redefine the problem to make them irrelevant”.
It’s going to be interesting to see how the incumbent Australian investors are going to deal with the new economy. Will they just sit on their behinds and enjoy the blessings of the current commodities boom and wait for the next housing boom? Or will they learn new tricks?
Or will a new generation come along and redefine the problem?
